Bashing Supplements

Why is there a many decades long battle to discredit nutrient supplementation?

You don’t often read any reports about the Codex Alimentarius initiative managed by the United Natons and WHO. WHO in May 2024 wants to become the SUPREME AUTHORITY on how to manage a global health crisis usurping the Sovreign rights of nation states. The overall purpose of Codex is to standardize food resources between nations. Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work out in the best interests of individual needs. Today, a research study claimed that you have a 30% higher risk of cancer if you take nutrient supplements, and they should all be classified as RX drugs and not sold over the counter. Click on the following to get this viewpoint.

Increased cancer risk?

I tried to comment on the article, but Microsoft decided I was NOT following Community Guidelines. So here is what I wanted to say:

Controlling the supplement industry and reducing its positive impact on the health of humans is the goal of Big Pharma. Studies that indicate that the foods consumed in the USA are deficient in key nutrients has been documented. Rather than demand we fix the food system, which includes eliminating trace toxins such as glyphosates, they want to have Americans more reliant on synthetic drugs that interfere with normal biosynthesis. Another disinformation study to boost the 500 Billion RX medical business!  

I became an advocate for Nutrient Supplementation when my wife was diagnosed with Large B Cell Lymphoma in 1999, when 80% of those who acquire it, passed before 5 years was reached. The oncologist’s mantra is that nutrient supplementation interferes with the effectiveness of the chemo treatment which at that time was called Chops. Since then, Rituxan has become vogue. The chemo destroys normal biosynthesis in the body and the goal is to destroy the Enlarged B Cells before the body is destroyed.

My research at the time indicated that changing my wife’s diet would be beneficial, and I made a nutrient rich milk shake for her daily.

After six rounds of Chops, the oncologist turned to me and said: I’m surprised at how well your wife is doing. Don’t tell me what you are doing, but just keep doing it.

She sailed through not 6 but 8 rounds of Chops, because they said they wanted to get the very last cancer cell. The truth is the Chemo source wanted to maximize their profitability. Years later a German study said 8 rounds were NO BETTER than six rounds. She was late stage three and was high risk. Not till the 9th year did the B cells return because of drug treatment for diabetes and a serious bacterial infection and they didn’t have a clue how to fix the problem. All experimental treatment that went south. Mayo researcher at that time said they didn’t have a clue why the B cells destroy the T cells that are supposed to destroy the cancer cells.

Clearly, the Covid con and the push to create RNA injections is a money game being supported by those who benefit. Same is true with growing the SYNTHETIC DRUGS used to treat disease states.

The following statement from Wikipedia Codex Alimentarius article zeros in on the motivation of discrediting supplements.

In 1996 the German delegation, sponsored by three German pharmaceutical firms, put forward a proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be reclassified as drugs.^[9] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted its implementation.^[9] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission was subsequently held July 4–9, 2005.^[10] Among the many issues discussed were the Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements,^[11] which were adopted during the meeting as new global safety guidelines: The guidelines state that "people should...be encouraged to select a balanced diet from food before considering any vitamin and mineral supplement. In cases where the intake from the diet is insufficient or where consumers consider their diet requires supplementation, vitamin and mineral food supplements serve to supplement the daily diet."^[11][12]

To this day, the hired wordsmiths and researchers are discrediting the true need and value of nutrient supplementation. The Majority Whip in Congress named Senator Richard Durbin is a Champion for this cause. His education at the Aspen Institute helped him see the light darkness.

The following article from www.grassrootshealth.net explains how moving the decimal point one digit over reduced the true safety of vitamin D supplementation.

This was done by IOM in 2011, which is now called National Academy of Medicine.

It is a pseudo government agency managed by medical and corporate entities that benefit by manipulating the healing arts.

Miscalculating the Real Safety of Vitamin D.

Have a Sunny Day and get your share of Vitamin D!

My thoughts for the day!

Thomas a Braun RPh.

PS: The fact my wife’s Vitamin D level was at 9 ng’s was not beneficial. We both lived together for almost 50 years, except she was told to stay out of the sun because she was a blue eyed blonde, and I played golf and my vitamin D was 50 ng’s.