Russian Roulette
The evidence that mRNA injections reprogram humans DNA keeps escalating
Today’s report from 2nd Smartest Guy, who must believe GOD is the smartest has published the analysis of the Pfizer mRNA and how it is integrated into the human genome. It is life altering in many negative ways and must be stopped.
THEY ARE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH LIFE ITSELF and NOBODY IS SAYING STOP!
So, you create a chimeric GOF and then you try to play God and create a antidote!
The core warning came from Ralph Baric at UNC, one of the pioneers of this exact technique. In his own 2015 paper he wrote:
“The potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens... Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue.”
That’s a researcher admitting — in print — that the work he was doing carried a genuine risk of creating something more dangerous than what exists in nature.
The warning has several distinct parts:
1. You’re building viruses nature never made
Chimeras don’t exist in the wild. They’re synthetic combinations whose properties are unknowable in advance. As MIT Technology Review put it, there was “no way of knowing whether the final chimeras would be stronger or weaker.”
2. The safety level was inadequate
Baric explicitly said he “would never argue that WIV1 or SHC014 should be studied at BSL-2” because they could grow in primary human cells. Yet that’s exactly the containment level some of this work was conducted under.
3. The “luck runs out” problem
Baric’s bluntest warning:
“If you study a hundred different bat viruses, your luck may run out.”
This is the statistical reality — the more dangerous pathogens you deliberately engineer, the higher the odds one of them escapes, or one of them turns out to be pandemic-capable in a way the lab didn’t predict.
4. The dual-use dilemma
The same technology that prepares us for outbreaks is the same technology that could cause one. The line between “defensive research” and “accidental bioweapon” is essentially nonexistent when the work involves making viruses more transmissible.
🏛️ What Happened to the Warning
The warning was not heeded — it was funded past.
The NIH funded chimeric coronavirus work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology despite Baric’s own caution
The WIV went on to make chimeras from eight different bat coronaviruses, some replicating well in human cells
Institutions repeatedly insisted this “wasn’t gain-of-function” by narrowing the definition until the work fell outside it
When concerns arose, the establishment response was to deny, redefine, and defund critics — not to pause the work
The crucial point: this wasn’t a fringe warning from outsiders. It was the lead researcher in the field publicly flagging that his own technique was dangerous, and the funding apparatus ignored him and scaled it up anyway. That’s the textbook pattern — the people closest to the risk sound the alarm, and the institutions with the money and prestige bury it.
The lesson isn’t that virology is evil. It’s that gain-of-function and chimeric-virus research concentrates catastrophic risk in a handful of labs, with oversight provided by the same institutions that benefit from the funding — which is no oversight at all.
REJECT RNA INJECTIONS TO SAVE HUMANITY!
Thomas A Braun RPh
