Validating RNA Injections
Medical researchers' ability to research depends on financial grants.
To stay in the medical research field, you need to stay in the game by going with the flow. When an astute researcher named Peter Duesberg working with grants from NAIAD division of CDC challenged Dr. Fauci’s approach to AIDS treatment and origin and questioned his support for the deadly drug AZT his funding was cut off and he became persona non grata. RJK Jr. Book entitled “The Real Anthony Fauci” details the events that lead to the deaths of thousands and thousands of AIDS patients who received the deadly AZT drug.
Validating medical science breakthroughs requires the ability to challenge the research to ensure it is factual and can be replicated. That has disappeared in today’s world of medical research, and we have devolved to consensus science with one scientist just endorsing the work of others in order to have the ability to stay in the game. They have learned the impact of the Duesberg effect.
Dr. Malone originated the basic science (patented) of how to have an RNA molecule injected into the human body and trick the immune system into not recognizing it as a foreign substance. As a result, the RNA injections are being injected into humans, and hogs and cattle today.
Dr. Malone agreed to be injected and had a severe reaction and it caused him to recognize the research was weak and the injections should be stopped. In turn, he became a persona non grata and his basic contribution to RNA research has been denied and he has become a research outcast like Duesberg as a result. In turn, he has fought back by working to have the truth known. In turn, he is being subject to character assassination. The following article by Dr. Malone is about the two researchers who have received the Noble Prize in Medicine, which has by passed Dr. Malone’s contribution. You need to decide if it is a valid recognition of their work.
I, in turn, question the motivation which has more to do about legitimatizing the RNA injections than for having lifesaving value. My view is as follows:
I have always admired the Karolinska Institute and their reviewers for their work in identifying those who have improved the health and welfare of humanity through honest medical research. The following statement is hard for me to swallow!
"For their discoveries concerning nucleotide base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19”.
The research is grossly deficient, and the RNA injections are not SAFE and EFFECTIVE. The medicine man is playing with the blueprint of life on a kindergarten scale and the great harm that has been done and will be done clearly is demonstrating that humanity has been reduced to lab rat status. In my opinion, the genesis for this research can be traced back to the US Biowarfare labs efforts to find effective bioweapons and their antidotes! The collusion between China and the US in Wuhan demonstrates this very clearly! This will not end well for humanity! Survival of humans will depend on how strong the immune system is and the fact that he/she rejects being injected!
My thoughts for the day.
Thomas A Braun RPh