What you got wrong is the presumption that oil came from plants and tiny little animals in the oceans. There is no evidence of that. Only coal has evidence of that source and that is shown by fossil evidence in coal. Back in the 1970s a group of scientists and engineers at the Texaco Research Center in Beacon, NY, theorized that the petroleum we get from the ground actually came from the cooling of the early atmosphere and that it literally rained liquid petroleum from the ancient sky. They came up with an experiment that showed this was possible. What they also discovered was the formation of amino acids in the soup that was generated in the experiment.
Here is another problem of the earth as billions of years old. Within the states of the Carolinas is a bone bed that was discovered in the 1800s and among the bones are humans and dinosaurs mixed together. Among the bones are other species that we have been told could not have lived at the same time. This bone bed has been dated as being approximately 50,000 years of age, making the earth much younger than has been supposed. It has also been theorized that the bone bed is from the great flood time.
There are rock layers in the Grand Canyon that are supposed to be millions of years old, except those layers wouldn't be there if they were that old because they would have been worn away in that amount of time. The flood of Noah was no only a flood that destroyed a wicked mankind but the entire rearrangement of the continent of Pangia to what you see today. The only evidence of the previous civilizations are things we cannot explain and that we have difficulty doing today even with our technologies. Some of the difficult things to explain are the intricate cutting of massive rocks with a precision that we only have now and that 'could not have existed 100,000 years ago or could it have?. How were the pyramids built? Nothing is plausible with what we do know of the past and that likely means that the pyramids in Giza or in other parts of the world, are from a time that predates the Great Flood.
It is much more probable that petroleum rained from the ancient atmosphere rather than from the accumulation of plants and animals. If that is true then how to explain coal especially when humans have found massive fossils of plants and animals buried in coal seams? We have coal and petroleum from the same source? One solid and one liquid? Coal exists in three primary forms; a coals that hasn't become predominantly carbon, bituminous that is predominantly carbon and then anthracite which is completely carbon. I guess we could add diamond to this list because it is actually a form of pure carbon too.
Interesting information. I googled the question and repeated what came up. I meet a British Army engineer who was stationed in Egypt and examined the pyramids. His answer was that humans didn't built them. It could be that coal buried deep in the earth is subject to extreme heat and is cooked into oil.
Coal can be liquefied and gasified as the Germans showed during WW2. Texaco came up with a process to turn coal into a gas that could be cleaned of sulfur, mercury and other contaminants. Then piped and sent to where it was needed to make other things or use like natural gas is used. Before 1901, coal was gasified using steam and I think it was called water gas. 1901 was the Lucas Gusher in Spindletop, Texas when oil was soon selling for $0.40 for a 42 gallon barrel. They also discovered copious amounts of natural gas.
The folks at Texaco created an experiment within a huge glass sphere and they were able to show that petroleum could have been created in the earth's early atmosphere and fell as rain.
My father was a senior research specialist or something like that and I remember the story he told about it. It was difficult to amaze my father and I remember he was amazed. When your father is one of those people that can invent things seemingly out of the blue and tools and instruments that are still in use 40 to 60 years after he designed them, you can maybe get an idea of the things that might amaze him. I was a late teenager when my father was working on a particularly difficult problem; he was designing a piece of test equipment that would simulate the torture experienced by a transmission lube used in an 18 wheeler that typically might have a lube capacity of many gallons, but use only one quart of oil in the test procedure. The other requirement was that the simulation had to be as though the lube had been used continuously for 100,000 miles, but the test period was only something like 10 days continuous. From what I was told by others that worked on this with my father, the device was a resounding success. The only thing different was that the test would only need to be run for 48 hours to achieve the same wear and chemical changes in the lube that an identical lube would experience in 100,000 miles of use. So, he was able to come up with a device that successfully simulated what would actually happen during 100,000 miles of use.
Possibly the people that were on the earth before the flood that destroyed everything and rearranged the continental land masses. Some of the more interesting things found at Giza and other locations around the world are rock/stones that have been precisely cut as if by a diamond embedded circular saw. In some cases it looks as if a cut was begun and then not finished, but leaves the evidence that something different was available at this place in a different time. We assume, incorrectly, that the cuts were made at the same time as the surrounding constructions, but I think we are making an assumption that is incorrect.
What you got wrong is that President Trump is in favor of the WHO-demanded injections. He announced he was exiting the WHO andbwrote to the WHO in May 2020, that we were Exiting. Biden reversed that. Trump has announced that he will again exit the WHO when he becomes President. Kennedy has not made that commitment at this time. Shanahan will probably not let him.
I do have to agree with you that American medicine does actually suck. I have yet to find, in recent years, any American trained doctor that will admit he or she doesn't know everything. They also think they know more than those of us that read the research literature. That is how you can tell if they are really full of shit. All these docs need to have their licenses to practice taken away.
When will statins be pulled off the market because they do more harm than good. We do have a cure for cancer and it is very expensive because the FDA will not give it their seal of approval even when it has been proven to actually work without killing the patient. Ever hear of neoplastons? Then you really do need to check out the work done by Dr. Burzynski starting in 1977. Many of his former patients have been cancer free for 47 years.
What you got wrong is the presumption that oil came from plants and tiny little animals in the oceans. There is no evidence of that. Only coal has evidence of that source and that is shown by fossil evidence in coal. Back in the 1970s a group of scientists and engineers at the Texaco Research Center in Beacon, NY, theorized that the petroleum we get from the ground actually came from the cooling of the early atmosphere and that it literally rained liquid petroleum from the ancient sky. They came up with an experiment that showed this was possible. What they also discovered was the formation of amino acids in the soup that was generated in the experiment.
Here is another problem of the earth as billions of years old. Within the states of the Carolinas is a bone bed that was discovered in the 1800s and among the bones are humans and dinosaurs mixed together. Among the bones are other species that we have been told could not have lived at the same time. This bone bed has been dated as being approximately 50,000 years of age, making the earth much younger than has been supposed. It has also been theorized that the bone bed is from the great flood time.
There are rock layers in the Grand Canyon that are supposed to be millions of years old, except those layers wouldn't be there if they were that old because they would have been worn away in that amount of time. The flood of Noah was no only a flood that destroyed a wicked mankind but the entire rearrangement of the continent of Pangia to what you see today. The only evidence of the previous civilizations are things we cannot explain and that we have difficulty doing today even with our technologies. Some of the difficult things to explain are the intricate cutting of massive rocks with a precision that we only have now and that 'could not have existed 100,000 years ago or could it have?. How were the pyramids built? Nothing is plausible with what we do know of the past and that likely means that the pyramids in Giza or in other parts of the world, are from a time that predates the Great Flood.
It is much more probable that petroleum rained from the ancient atmosphere rather than from the accumulation of plants and animals. If that is true then how to explain coal especially when humans have found massive fossils of plants and animals buried in coal seams? We have coal and petroleum from the same source? One solid and one liquid? Coal exists in three primary forms; a coals that hasn't become predominantly carbon, bituminous that is predominantly carbon and then anthracite which is completely carbon. I guess we could add diamond to this list because it is actually a form of pure carbon too.
Interesting information. I googled the question and repeated what came up. I meet a British Army engineer who was stationed in Egypt and examined the pyramids. His answer was that humans didn't built them. It could be that coal buried deep in the earth is subject to extreme heat and is cooked into oil.
Coal can be liquefied and gasified as the Germans showed during WW2. Texaco came up with a process to turn coal into a gas that could be cleaned of sulfur, mercury and other contaminants. Then piped and sent to where it was needed to make other things or use like natural gas is used. Before 1901, coal was gasified using steam and I think it was called water gas. 1901 was the Lucas Gusher in Spindletop, Texas when oil was soon selling for $0.40 for a 42 gallon barrel. They also discovered copious amounts of natural gas.
The folks at Texaco created an experiment within a huge glass sphere and they were able to show that petroleum could have been created in the earth's early atmosphere and fell as rain.
My father was a senior research specialist or something like that and I remember the story he told about it. It was difficult to amaze my father and I remember he was amazed. When your father is one of those people that can invent things seemingly out of the blue and tools and instruments that are still in use 40 to 60 years after he designed them, you can maybe get an idea of the things that might amaze him. I was a late teenager when my father was working on a particularly difficult problem; he was designing a piece of test equipment that would simulate the torture experienced by a transmission lube used in an 18 wheeler that typically might have a lube capacity of many gallons, but use only one quart of oil in the test procedure. The other requirement was that the simulation had to be as though the lube had been used continuously for 100,000 miles, but the test period was only something like 10 days continuous. From what I was told by others that worked on this with my father, the device was a resounding success. The only thing different was that the test would only need to be run for 48 hours to achieve the same wear and chemical changes in the lube that an identical lube would experience in 100,000 miles of use. So, he was able to come up with a device that successfully simulated what would actually happen during 100,000 miles of use.
Who does he say built them? They are precise.
Possibly the people that were on the earth before the flood that destroyed everything and rearranged the continental land masses. Some of the more interesting things found at Giza and other locations around the world are rock/stones that have been precisely cut as if by a diamond embedded circular saw. In some cases it looks as if a cut was begun and then not finished, but leaves the evidence that something different was available at this place in a different time. We assume, incorrectly, that the cuts were made at the same time as the surrounding constructions, but I think we are making an assumption that is incorrect.
Some of the artifacts found require tools. Why have they not found them? Precision inter locking of stones amaze me.
Thank you.
What you got wrong is that President Trump is in favor of the WHO-demanded injections. He announced he was exiting the WHO andbwrote to the WHO in May 2020, that we were Exiting. Biden reversed that. Trump has announced that he will again exit the WHO when he becomes President. Kennedy has not made that commitment at this time. Shanahan will probably not let him.
I do have to agree with you that American medicine does actually suck. I have yet to find, in recent years, any American trained doctor that will admit he or she doesn't know everything. They also think they know more than those of us that read the research literature. That is how you can tell if they are really full of shit. All these docs need to have their licenses to practice taken away.
When will statins be pulled off the market because they do more harm than good. We do have a cure for cancer and it is very expensive because the FDA will not give it their seal of approval even when it has been proven to actually work without killing the patient. Ever hear of neoplastons? Then you really do need to check out the work done by Dr. Burzynski starting in 1977. Many of his former patients have been cancer free for 47 years.
True!