Respectfully, if, as I've read postulated, the mRNA injections are a death sentence at no more than 5 years from injection, then they would be something more than "just the newest layer of harm". don't you think? The foregoing assertion was made by a physician of some repute. Given the morbidity and mortality easily observable globally, I would not be comfortable dismissing such a proposition out of hand. Given also that we are dealing with a KNOWN synthetic biological weapon proven lethal at varying intervals post introduction that can not but be causally related to the unprecedented explosion of terminal maladies, and that no one can KNOW they are not fatal at 5 years out, that that is a very real possibility, I think it imprudent to refer to them as "just the newest layer of harm". From where I sit, mRNA as deployed, looks much more like a realistic potential extinction level agent. No one can know right now that the posit is not accurate.
This is another instance where I would really prefer to be proven wrong. We'll see. Rather, only some of us will see.
One in twenty six are autistic today. It's probably higher than that.
Should be job #1 to find out and stop it, but it would hurt Big Pharma's profits.
This is really as big a crime as SARS-CoV-2. Just spread out a little more.
Respectfully, if, as I've read postulated, the mRNA injections are a death sentence at no more than 5 years from injection, then they would be something more than "just the newest layer of harm". don't you think? The foregoing assertion was made by a physician of some repute. Given the morbidity and mortality easily observable globally, I would not be comfortable dismissing such a proposition out of hand. Given also that we are dealing with a KNOWN synthetic biological weapon proven lethal at varying intervals post introduction that can not but be causally related to the unprecedented explosion of terminal maladies, and that no one can KNOW they are not fatal at 5 years out, that that is a very real possibility, I think it imprudent to refer to them as "just the newest layer of harm". From where I sit, mRNA as deployed, looks much more like a realistic potential extinction level agent. No one can know right now that the posit is not accurate.
This is another instance where I would really prefer to be proven wrong. We'll see. Rather, only some of us will see.